MRPG Triangle - Revision history

CourseDirector at 03:10, 27 December 2018

2018-12-27T03:10:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 27 December 2018
Line 25:		Line 25:

	However, a good hybrid character should never be focused on a single skill to the exclusion of all others. What would be the point of taking the class otherwise?		However, a good hybrid character should never be focused on a single skill to the exclusion of all others. What would be the point of taking the class otherwise?

			[[Category:Mage Wars RPG]]

Siddharth1 at 02:35, 15 December 2018

2018-12-15T02:35:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 15 December 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>

	And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense for a spellcaster. The mage's triangle ~~shoudl~~ look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.		And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense for a spellcaster. The mage's triangle should look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.

Siddharth1 at 02:35, 15 December 2018

2018-12-15T02:35:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 15 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Triangle is a visual way to represent how your character is meant to operate in combat. The three basic ~~tennets~~ being ranged, melee, and magic.		The Triangle is a visual way to represent how your character is meant to operate in combat. The three basic tenets being ranged, melee, and magic.

	<table>		<table>
Line 6:		Line 6:
	</td>		</td>
	<td valign="top">		<td valign="top">
	All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "~~He who is the~~ jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has ~~it's~~ value.		All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes, "The jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, because good utility has its value.
	<table><tr><td valign="top">		<table><tr><td valign="top">
	Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:		Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:
Line 12:		Line 12:
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>

	And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense ~~because they are~~ a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.		And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense for a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.



	==Hybrid Triangles==		==Hybrid Triangles==
	The Hybrid classes ([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And because of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.		The Hybrid classes ([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, and magic and combat become one. And because of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
	[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]		[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]

Siddharth1: /* Hybrid Triangles */

2014-10-27T02:27:27Z

Hybrid Triangles

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 27 October 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:

	==Hybrid Triangles==		==Hybrid Triangles==
	The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.		The Hybrid classes ([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And because of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
	[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]		[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]

CourseDirector: /* Hybrid Triangles */

2013-11-17T21:38:40Z

Hybrid Triangles

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 17 November 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Hybrid triangles can also look a bit more like this:		Hybrid triangles can also look a bit more like this:

	[[File:Otherhybrid.jpg]]		[[File:Otherhybrid.jpg]]

	However, a good hybrid character should never be focused on a single skill to the exclusion of all others. What would be the point of taking the class otherwise?		However, a good hybrid character should never be focused on a single skill to the exclusion of all others. What would be the point of taking the class otherwise?

CourseDirector at 20:15, 17 November 2013

2013-11-17T20:15:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 17 November 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.		The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
	[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]		[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]

			Hybrid triangles can also look a bit more like this:
			[[File:Otherhybrid.jpg]]

			However, a good hybrid character should never be focused on a single skill to the exclusion of all others. What would be the point of taking the class otherwise?

CourseDirector at 20:12, 17 November 2013

2013-11-17T20:12:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 17 November 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<td valign="top">		<td valign="top">
	All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.		All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.
	<table><tr><~~tdvalign~~="top">		<table><tr><td valign="top">
	Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:		Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:
	</td><td>[[File:Line.jpg]]</td></tr></table>		</td><td>[[File:Line.jpg]]</td></tr></table>
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>

	And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense because they are a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.		And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense because they are a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.



			==Hybrid Triangles==
			The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
			[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]

CourseDirector at 20:12, 17 November 2013

2013-11-17T20:12:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 17 November 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>
	And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense because they are a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.		And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense because they are a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.

	~~==Hybrid Triangles==~~
	The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
	~~[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]~~

CourseDirector at 20:12, 17 November 2013

2013-11-17T20:12:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 17 November 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<td valign="top">		<td valign="top">
	All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.		All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.
	<table><tr><td>		<table><tr><tdvalign="top">
	Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:		Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:
	</td><td>[[File:Line.jpg]]</td></tr></table>		</td><td>[[File:Line.jpg]]</td></tr></table>
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>
			And that, as well, is completely acceptable. Ideally, a [[MRPG Warrior\|Warrior's]] triangle SHOULD look a lot like that. A Mage's triangle should not. That would mean they are putting all their capabilities into melee, which doesn't make sense because they are a spellcaster. The mage's triangle shoudl look like a line going the other way, with "magic" instead.

			==Hybrid Triangles==
			The Hybrid classes([[MRPG Paladin]] and [[MRPG Battling Sorcerer]]) get a bit more interesting. These classes are designed to have a certain amount of generalization. They are the bridge between the sword and the spell, magic and combat become one. And of course no self-respecting Paladin is going to let a little thing like distance get in the way, it helps to have some ranged ability.
			[[File:Hybrid.jpg]]

CourseDirector at 19:53, 17 November 2013

2013-11-17T19:53:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 17 November 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<td valign="top">		<td valign="top">
	All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.		All things being equal, the triangle should look like an isosceles: all sides the same. Of course, as the saying goes "He who is the jack of all trades is the master of none." - the character who wishes to generalize in all three can be effective and versatile, but never attain mastery in any one area. Players should not shy away from this, good utility has it's value.
			<table><tr><td>
			Characters need not generalize, of course. The aim is to provide a very flexible framework, allowing players the widest possibly array of options. One player might look at the available arcotypes and decide to focus entirely on hitting things with a sword, and have a triangle that is less a triangle and more a line:
			</td><td>[[File:Line.jpg]]</td></tr></table>
	</td></tr></table>		</td></tr></table>