Difference between revisions of "Horseman"
(Created page with 'The Horseman was the Foundation's first attempt at a long-range bomber, and was the predeccessor to the Harpy. Horsemans were produced begining in A.Y. 5701 and officiall…') |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The Horseman was the Foundation's first attempt at a long-range bomber, and was the predeccessor to the [[Harpy]]. Horsemans were produced begining in [[A.Y.]] | + | The Horseman was the Foundation's first attempt at a long-range bomber, and was the predeccessor to the [[Harpy]]. Horsemans were produced begining in [[A.Y.]] 5971 and officially retired in A.Y. 620, a period of 50 years. |
− | Despite a long production record, few | + | In a rare move, design and production of the Horseman was contracted to an outside firm, making it one of the very few fighters not designed, tested, and built entirely in [[Gudersnipe]]-owned facilities. |
+ | |||
+ | Despite a relatively long production record, few Horsemen were produced, and even fewer deployed into active combat. The Horseman was deemed too slow and unwieldy to survive in high or even medium-threat environments. | ||
Though officially cast as a 40PSL+ fighter, the Horseman could barely reach 38, and not within the alloted time of the [[acceleration curve]] test. | Though officially cast as a 40PSL+ fighter, the Horseman could barely reach 38, and not within the alloted time of the [[acceleration curve]] test. | ||
− | Following | + | Following retirement from active service, most Horseman bombers were scrapped, with only a handful saved for museums. |
+ | |||
+ | The Horseman's legacy was in proving the need for a long-range bomber, though it failed to fill that rôle. | ||
− | + | [[Category:Course Books]] |
Latest revision as of 02:53, 27 December 2018
The Horseman was the Foundation's first attempt at a long-range bomber, and was the predeccessor to the Harpy. Horsemans were produced begining in A.Y. 5971 and officially retired in A.Y. 620, a period of 50 years.
In a rare move, design and production of the Horseman was contracted to an outside firm, making it one of the very few fighters not designed, tested, and built entirely in Gudersnipe-owned facilities.
Despite a relatively long production record, few Horsemen were produced, and even fewer deployed into active combat. The Horseman was deemed too slow and unwieldy to survive in high or even medium-threat environments.
Though officially cast as a 40PSL+ fighter, the Horseman could barely reach 38, and not within the alloted time of the acceleration curve test.
Following retirement from active service, most Horseman bombers were scrapped, with only a handful saved for museums.
The Horseman's legacy was in proving the need for a long-range bomber, though it failed to fill that rôle.